Working with the sector, Advance HE plans to develop a global survey for leadership in higher education, research institutes and related organisations.
The extraordinary events brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic have brought into sharp focus the question ‘what works for leadership in higher education?’
Without reasonable clarity on this it is hard to invest in leaders, support leadership development, and recognise good practice in a consistent and reliable way. It is also difficult for organisations to plan leadership structures and capacity, and to grow the talent for tomorrow.
The project will generate a unique evidence base for leadership in higher education, highlight contextual variations across the sector and around the world and explore the impact of leadership development. It will also inform the development of a sector-led global leadership framework for enhancement and recognition.
As the first step, Advance HE has commissioned a scoping study that will be undertaken by a research team led by the University of Bristol and involving colleagues from the University of the West of England and Swansea University. This research study consisting of a literature review, a series of eleven roundtable discussions and dissemination events will inform the survey design.
It is no exaggeration to say that the future success of higher education in every country around the world will depend on leadership. This has been powerfully illustrated by the role of leadership in the sector’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We must learn from this and also it is very timely, when reflecting on that learning to define the leadership needed for the HE of the future.
The vision for this project, which is a key part of Advance HE’s overall strategy, is to develop a global framework for leadership in higher education and related organisations. To shape and inform this we are also going to launch a large-scale annual leadership survey. This whole process should be one of the largest collective conversations about leadership in higher education ever undertaken, an opportunity which we all can embrace, hence our invitation to you to be part of this work.
Objectives of the project
The broad objectives of the Advance HE Leadership Survey are to:
- Start to generate a unique evidence base for leadership in HE
- Reveal how staff in HE conceive of leadership
- Help to articulate the values, behaviours and constructs that contribute to effective leadership (including through different roles and levels)
- Highlight contextual variations across the sector and around the world
- Contrast the views of those leading and those being led
- Explore the impact of leadership development
- Promote the importance of the reflective leadership practitioner
- Generate clear, reliable, and objective data that can inform the development and operation of a leadership framework
- Assist organisations in designing, developing, and nurturing their leadership capacity.
In undertaking this study we assume as a research team a significant duty of care in ensuring that all members of our higher education community are given equal license to lead discussion in terms of what is meant, practised and received as leadership. Our methodology which consists, beyond a literature review, of round table events with discussants from across the sector and professional hierarchies is thus intended to provide a holistic and inclusive forum for critical deliberation. This conversation on higher education leadership will thus emphatically, be led by you.
Professor Richard Watermeyer
Professor of Higher Education and Co-Director of the Centre for Higher Education Transformations (CHET),
University of Bristol
Scoping study roundtables
A series of eleven roundtables were convened with representatives from the sector to discuss the scope of the proposed survey and the focus areas that will shape its content. The roundtables were attended by those in the following groups:
- Academic deans and heads of departments
- Staff and organisational development professionals
- Professional service leaders
- Early career academics
- Senior executive group x 2
- Professional representative and funding bodies
- The professoriate
- Professional service first-line managers
- Trade unions and HE related support organisations
- Established academics
Outputs from the scoping study
The specific outputs from the scoping study led by the research team will be as follows:
- A series of dissemination and engagement events in February 2022
- A summary report for Advance HE members and the wider HE community based on all of the information and evidence gathered
- An outline design to inform the development of a global survey for leadership in higher education, research institutes and related organisations. The survey itself will be finalised and launched in 2022
Dissemination and engagement events
At the next stage in the scoping study underpinning development of the Advance HE Leadership Survey, we are hosted a series of dissemination and engagement events in February 2022. Participants were able to:
- Learn more about the Advance HE Global Leadership Survey and Framework initiative, and its significance for supporting leaders and leadership at all levels in the disrupted and rapidly evolving landscape of higher education
- Be part of this crucial sector-wide conversation about 'what works for leadership in higher education?'
- Gain a first-hand insight into the fascinating initial findings from the scoping study
- Contribute directly to the study by responding to the findings through live polls and other activities
- Reflect on their own leadership and context through the lens of the findings so far
- Hear cross-sector accounts from some of the roundtable participants about their experience
These events brought together the widest possible community of colleagues to hear first-hand some of the initial findings from the research and, importantly, respond to them.
All colleagues from higher education institutions worldwide and related organisations were welcomed to attend and participate.
Ahead of the events, Doug Parkin, Advance HE Principal Adviser for Leadership and Management and project lead, discussed the project and the richness of the findings with Richard Bolden, Professor of Leadership and Management and Director of Bristol leadership and Change Centre at the University West of England, UWE Bristol, and Richard Watermeyer, Professor of Higher Education at the University of Bristol and co-director of the Center for Higher Education Transformations.
You can watch one of the engagement events here:
The Advance HE Global Leadership Survey for Higher Education
Following a comprehensive, year-long consultation with the sector the new Advance HE Global Leadership Survey for Higher Education (and related organisations) will launch in September. This will be the inaugural running of the survey and we will be promoting and encouraging the widest possible levels of participation.
Over the last year an independent scoping study has taken place driven by our central question, What works for leadership in higher education? This collaborative research has informed the survey design. The findings from the scoping study will be published as a report at the beginning of September, shortly before the launch of the leadership survey itself, the next stage of enquiry examining our fundamental ‘what works?’ question.
The survey will be aimed at leaders at all levels, in a formal or informal role. For the purpose of the survey a broad definition of leader/leadership is adopted in recognition of the diversity of roles and relationships across the HE sector.
As a global survey, we will be welcoming participation from colleagues at HE institutions and related organisation around the world.
If you would like to be sent the survey link and notified when the survey is live please register for project updates.
Professor Richard Watermeyer
Professor of Higher Education and Co-Director of the Centre for Higher Education Transformations (CHET), University of Bristol
Richard Watermeyer is Professor of Higher Education and Co-Director of the Centre for Higher Education Transformations (CHET) in the School of Education at the University of Bristol. He is by training and orientation, a sociologist of higher education with expertise related to academic praxis; institutional and research governance; scientific accountability and engagement; and higher education policy reform. He has held previous academic appointments at the universities of Bath, Warwick, Surrey and Cardiff; in addition to having been seconded into government and experience of establishing and directing a university spin-out. His recent research has focused on the organisational and health and wellbeing impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on university communities; he is also leading research within an international programme exploring the future of education and work in the context of global digitalisation. His recent books include: Competitive Accountability in Academic Life and The Impact Agenda.
Professor Richard Bolden
Professor of Leadership and Management and Director of Bristol Leadership and Change Centre, University of the West of England
Richard Bolden is Professor of Leadership and Management and Director of Bristol Leadership and Change Centre at Bristol Business School, University of the West of England (UWE). His research explores the interface between individual and collective approaches to leadership and leadership development in sectors including higher education, health and social care and public services.
He has led projects funded by the NHS Leadership Academy and Leadership Foundation for Higher Education (now Advance HE), amongst others, and has published widely on topics including distributed, shared and systems leadership; leadership paradoxes and complexity; cross-cultural leadership; and leadership and change. At UWE he leads modules on leadership, complexity and change for the EMBA and Advanced Clinical Practitioner degree apprenticeship programme and contributes to a range of other undergraduate, postgraduate and post-experience programmes.
Professor Bruce Macfarlane
Dean, University of Hong Kong
Bruce Macfarlane is Dean designate of the Faculty of Education and Human Development and Professor of Educational Leadership and Equity at the Education University of Hong Kong. He has previously held chairs at universities in the UK and Hong Kong, is a former Head of the School of Education at the University of Bristol, UK and is currently guest professor at the University of Boras in Sweden. He has also held visiting professorial positions in Japan, South Africa and Australia.
Through his research and scholarship, Bruce has developed conceptual frameworks for interpreting academic practice, ethics and leadership. His major works include Teaching with Integrity (2004), The Academic Citizen (2007), Researching with Integrity (2009), Intellectual Leadership in Higher Education (2012) and Freedom to Learn (2016). He is currently writing a new book for Routledge about the freedom to teach in higher education.
Dr Cathryn Knight
Lecturer, Swansea University
Cathryn Knight is a Lecturer in Education based in the School of Education at Swansea University, having previous completed her ESRC-funded PhD at Cardiff University. Knight has extensive expertise in qualitative and quantitative research design and analysis and is currently involved in a range of national (e.g. Welsh Government) and international (e.g. ERASMUS+) funded research projects.
She has advanced quantitative research experience developed through being awarded the Advanced Quantitative Methods Stipend from the ESRC. Her interest lies in the area of Additional Learning Needs (ALN) and inclusive education, with a particular interest in dyslexia. Further areas of interest include teacher education, the Welsh education system and the use of secondary/administrative data in educational research.
In a similar way to learning and teaching, the complexity of leadership in higher education cannot be captured as a fixed set of raw competencies. There is much to do with the culture of the organisation, the context of the team, the character of the individual and the challenge of the task, to list just four significant variables, that influence how leadership may operate. Again, in a similar way to teaching, there are also contrasting views on how leadership is defined and interpreted as a practice. Linked to this, universities, colleges, and research institutes as social institutions generate constructs that shape expectations as regards both leaders and leadership. This all points towards a framework that is illustrative rather than definitive, interpretable to context, and developmental.
Principal Adviser for Leadership and Management,