Skip to main content

Give me what I need to pass: Approaches to learning course complaints and academic performance among undergraduate student ‘consumers’ - HEA Surveys Conference 2017

Undergraduates who self-identify as a consumer of their education achieve lower academic grades than those who do not (Bunce Baird & Jones 2016). The current study tested the hypothesis that this is because paying fees creates a customer – service-provider relationship between students and universities which fosters passive or surface approaches to learning. 679 undergraduates studying in England UK completed an online questionnaire to assess their consumer orientation level of course complaints approaches to learning and level of academic performance. The analysis replicated previous findings and supported the hypotheses finding that poorer academic performance was associated with identifying more strongly as a consumer making more course complaints and engaging more in surface approaches to learning. Furthermore the relationships between identifying as a consumer and complaining with academic performance were mediated by level of surface approach to learning. Implications for positioning students as consumers and charging increasingly higher tuition fees are discussed.

give_me_what_i_need_to_pass-_approaches_to_learning_course_complaints_and_academic_performance_among.pdf
06/06/2017
give_me_what_i_need_to_pass-_approaches_to_learning_course_complaints_and_academic_performance_among.pdf View Document

The materials published on this page were originally created by the Higher Education Academy.