Gain unique and essential insights into the student academic experience
SAES has been designed and developed in partnership with the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) and with interviews conducted independently by YouthSight. The survey:
- Helps you better understand student expectations, perceptions and their experience of learning and teaching
- Provides key facts and insights to help you improve the student academic experience
- Plays a key role in influencing policy at a national level
What is SAES?
Pinpoint how you can shape and meet student expectations
The Student Academic Experience Survey, run in partnership with HEPI, is the only survey that provides essential data on key topics including contact hours, the number of assignments and student expectations of the time it takes academics to return these assignments, student wellbeing, their knowledge of access to counselling services and student perceptions on value for money.
Why participate in SAES?
Thrive in a world of teaching excellence
Over 15,000 full-time undergraduate students participate in the Student Academic Experience Survey annually. Respondents are drawn from the YouthSight student panel, which is made up of over 78,000 undergraduate students in the UK. Since its launch in 2006, it has had a significant impact on policymakers particularly as demonstrated in the 2015 higher education green paper and the 2016 higher education white paper.
In particular, the survey illustrates where universities can take action to shape and meet the expectations of students in terms of their teaching and learning experience.
Our Survey takes place at the same time each year among a directly comparable undergraduate sample, enabling us to measure genuine like-for-like changes. This year’s results highlight a number of positive shifts in student opinion, with evidence that the university experience is largely a challenging but rewarding one, albeit with some students who do not see things in such a positive light:
- Perceptions of value-for-money have increased significantly for the second year in a row.
- Teaching quality and assessment have both improved strongly.
- Levels of wellbeing continue to be well below those of the general population of young people.
- Although respondents were not widely against the concept of a two-year accelerated degree, neither was it greeted with particular enthusiasm.
- Overall, results this year shine light on a student cohort that is realistic about the costs of going to university and recognises when they are challenged positively and receive good value as a result.
The findings along with previous years’ reports can be downloaded here.